You are here:
When does the librarianship became a science in Russia?
Vaneev A. N.
Bibliosphere. 2016. № 3. P. 75–79.
DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2016-3-75-79
The main article objective is a terminological analysis of «librarianship» concept. The development of theoretical concepts of librarianship as a science and as a branch of knowledge is explored. The concept of «library thought» and its correspondence with the concept of «the history of librarianship» is analyzed. The author substantiate the idea that the library thought development did not contradict the history of library science and was its important part, librarian¬ship roots should be traced with the emergence of the first libraries. This point of view on the history of librarianship found understanding in the works by I. V. Lukashov, V. V. Skvortsov, M. I. Slukhovsky, Yu. N. Stolyarov and other library scholars.
The article deals with polemic questions: when has librarianship been recognized as a science; can the first use of the concept of «librarianship» be considered as a sign of the emergence of library science. The analysis of applying the concept «library science» showed that before the early XX century it was defined as «a systematic presentation of knowledge about libraries organization and the management».
The article analyzes dividing the library science into theoretical and practical parts; examines the fate of the theoreti-cal librarianship in frames of «theoretical» discussions taken place in early 1930s, and attempts of Soviet scientists
(V. A. Artisevich, I. A. Mesenyashin, N. Ya. Fridieva) to revive the theoretical library science; considers the views of Yu. V. Grigoriev substantiated the library science as independent one.
Analysis of the national library science thought development in 1960s–70s of the XX century showed that its deve¬lopment was characterized by a scientific approach, with heightened attention to general theoretical and methodologi-cal problems that contributed to forming the librarianship as a science.
The article states that in the modern terminology of the national library science there are two concepts: as a librarian-ship independent science and as a branch of knowledge. Combination into a single term of at least two different
«library sciences» leads both to typological and substantial inconsistencies and errors, which can be seen in a variety of theoretical and practical disciplines including the word «librarianship».
The author offers two options concerning use of the term «librarianship». The first one is to call the «librarianship» on the western model «library science», and the term «librarianship» applies to various disciplines (library science as a branch of knowledge). The second one is to retain in national science traditional name «librarianship» as a synonym for «library science» and not to use the word «librarianship» in the titles of different library disciplines to avoid con-fusion.
Keywords: librarianship, librarianship as a science, library science as a branch of knowledge, librarianship thought, library science history.
References
1. Artisevich V. A. On the problem of the Soviet librarianship development results. Bibliotechnaya legenda. Saratov, 1991, 105–145. (In Russ.).
2. Vaneev A. N. Ot knizhno-bibliotechnoi komissii instituta vneshkol’nogo obrazovaniya do kafedry bibliotekovedeniya i teorii chteniya. SPbGUKI (1918–2008): istoricheskii ocherk [From the book-library commission of the Non-formal Education Institute to the chair of librarianship and reading theory. SPbSUCA: a historical essay]. Saint Petersburg, 2009. 112 p. (In Russ.).
3. Vaneev A. N. Razvitie bibliotekovedcheskoi mysli v Rossii (XI – nachalo XX v.) [Development of library science ideas in Russia (XI – early XX century)]. Moscow, Pashkov pub-lishing house, 2013. 304 p. (In Russ.).
4. Vaneev A. N. Razvitie bibliotekovedcheskoi mysli v SSSR [Development of library science ideas in the USSR]. Mos-cow, Book, 1980. 232 p. (In Russ.).
5. Vaneev A. N. «Theoretical discussion» at the beginning
of 1930s and its effect on the destinies of domestic lib-rary scientists. Vaneev A. N. Bibliotechnoe delo. Teo-
riya. Metodika. Praktika. Saint Peterburg, 2004, 54–75. (In Russ.).
6. Grigoriev Yu. V. The Russian library science history (1701–1860). Yu. V. Grigoriev (1899–1977). Stolyarov Yu. N. (comp.). Moscow, 1989, 69–208. (In Russ.).
7. Romanov P. S. Bibliotekovedenie zarubezhnykh stran vo vtoroi polovine XX – nachale XXI veka [Library science of foreign countries during the late XX – early XXI centuries]. Moscow, 2012. 182 p. (In Russ.).
8. Sikorskii N. M. Soviet library science: the main directions of development, urgent tasks. Sovetskoe bibliotekovedenie, 1978, 2, 3–23. (In Russ.).
9. Skvortsov V. V. Teoreticheskie osnovy bibliotekovedeniya [Theoretical grounds of library science]. Moscow, 1996. 88 p. (In Russ.).
10. Slovar’ bibliotechnykh terminov [The dictionary of library terms]. Moscow, Book Publishing House, 1976. 224 p.
(In Russ.).
11. Sukiasyan E. R. A series of text-books for future bache-lors. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2015, 8, 49–63.
(In Russ.).
12. Khavkina L. B. Biblioteki, ikh organizatsiya i tekhnika: ru¬kovodstvo po bibliotekovedeniyu [Libraries, their orga¬nization and technique: guide for library activities. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg, 1911. 704 p. (In Russ.).